Web Optimization Blog

Covering the intersections of site quality, usability, structure, web analytics, accessibility, privacy and search optimization

Mobile Web Epiphany – The 7th Mass Media

Posted by dpascoe on November 20, 2008

When I set out to research information for an article about the Mobile Web, I had the mindset that Mobile Web was quite immature, that the challenges of getting content onto the mobile phone were many and not well addressed yet. And then I found Tomi Ahonen’s article from May 2008 on his blog “Communities Dominate Brands”. What an epiphany! He made me realize that my concept of mobile web was all wrong.

He likens the current concept of putting the “real internet” on the phone (Like the iPhone) to

  • putting the real horse into our car
  • the real symphony orchestra inside our radio
  • like using your TV to listen to radio

It using a mobile phone to access the 6th mass media.

He’s not saying that there isn’t a market for the iPhone, rather that using the iPhone – or any smartphone - to access html-created websites is NOT the form factor or the utility of the mobile services business.

His article is jam-packed with information and anecdotes – here I’ve summarized a lot of the metrics he cites. It is not a substitute, though, for reading the complete article.

First some basic numbers, according to a recent presentation by Morgan Stanley’s Mary Meeker at the San Francisco Web 2.0 conference (see image below), there are currently 349MM Broadband users globally, and 3.3BN mobile users - 9 ½ times more mobile subscribers globally than broadband subscribers

Now, the summary of Tomi’s article (and a note of thanks for his permission to quote):

Mobile is The 7th Mass Media

  • with Print the first - 500 years old,
  • Recordings the second - around 100 years old,
  • Cinema the third, - around 100 years old,
  • Radio the fourth, - around 100 years old, took 38 years to get to 50MM people*
  • TV the fifth and – around 50 years old, took 13 years to get to 50MM people*
  • The Internet the sixth in this sequence -15 years old, took 4 years to get to 50MM* people

This year, 2008, will be the cross-over point when more users will access internet content (including WAP) via a mobile phone, than via any kind of PC/laptop.

  • has already happened in advanced mobile-savvy countries Japan and South Korea,
  • happening the mainstream countries like the UK
  • and in developing countries like India and South Africa

On Nov. 4 Nokia announced a series of new devices and services designed extend the benefits of the Web to rural India, including crop information for farmers and mobile e-mail for people who don’t have access to a personal computer.

Today, the internet is worth 45 Billion dollars in revenues - three largest revenue types are

  • advertising,
  • adult entertainment and
  • gambling

By contrast, mobile is worth $72Bn with adult entertainment, gambling and advertising on mobile - each worth about 2 Billion dollars, more or less. But of the $72Bn value of mobile content, there are several far bigger content types:

  • Music on mobile is worth over 9 Billion dollars.
  • Gaming is worth 5 Billion (Source Netsize Guide 2008).
  • There are half a dozen content types already for mobile that have grown to be bigger than adult entertainment and gambling. (screen savers, Sudoku puzzles, personal services.
  • In Japan, in 2006 text-based books sold directly to mobile phones totaled 82MM.

Mobile social networking was launched commercially in South Korea only in 2003;

  • was worth 6 Billion dollars in 2007 (source Informa 2008) and
  • had over 100 million paying users on mobile

Zero in 2003 – 6BN in 2007

At the end of 2007,

  • 2.4 billion people - 74% of all mobile phone users - were active users of SMS text messaging
  • 800 million active unique users of email
  • <500 million active users of all kinds of IM Instant Messaging services
  • In Finland interactive SMS text messaging already delivers more revenues to the TV broadcast industry than advertising or subscription income
  • UK - 20% of the total viewing audience participates monthly in voting on reality TV shows via SMS
  • Japan, 30% of TV viewers interact with TV content in all manner of ways via the mobile

With all this, I’m now convinced that the Mobile Web will not replace the PC-based web.  It will cause a lot of disruption as organizations experiment and struggle and come to grips with whether and how they need a Mobile Web presence. The Mobile Web is all about connecting on a personal level with people.  It’s about giving people what they want, not what you want them to have.  It’s about engaging them on their terms, not yours.

Wow. Power to the people!

*The Emerging Digital Economy - http://www.amazon.com/Emerging-Digital-Economy-Dept-Commerce/dp/1892209160

Posted in 7th mass media, mobile web, social networking, social networks, usability | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

Social Web - The New Category Killer

Posted by dpascoe on September 21, 2008

I can recall speculation going back years, right after it was clear that email was the holy grail, about the prospect of this or that thing being the new category killer.  None has held up to the hype…til now.  Just this week several things crossed my screen about the social web that just SCREAM category killer.

First, Boone Pickens has turned to social media to get the word out about the Pickens Plan. If you want to get on board to help change our dependency on foreign oil, this site gives you a plethora of ways to get involved - from an RSS feed, to Facebook, Myspace, Twitter and YouTube.   So here’s a guy that is about as opposite from the plugged-in-iphone-toting-twitter-mob-participating 20-something as there is.  No matter. Boone Pickens is a self-made man and he got where he is by figuring out what he wanted to accomplish and then marshalling the forces to get it done.  Nothing has changed; he’s just implemented some new tools.

Second, Webguild published an article about a recently released study by Sapient that can accurately be described as a call to arms to digital agencies.  Ninety percent of respondents agree that it is increasingly important for their agencies use “pull interactions”  - social networks and online communities, rather than “push campaigns”.  This same study found that nearly half (45 percent) of the respondents have switched agencies (or plan to switch in the next 12 months) for one with greater digital knowledge or have hired an additional digital specialist to handle their interactive campaigns”.  Whoa, think about it - what is the churn rate of agencies if 45% plan to switch.  If I was an agency CEO, first I’d be reaching for the Maalox. Second, I’d be learning everything there is to know about social media, and developing “best use” profiles for each one.

Third, social media has outstripped pornography as the most frequently searched topic on the web. According to Bill Tancer, general manager of global research at Hitwise, surfing for porn has dropped from 20 percent a decade ago to about 10 percent of searches.  The hottest internet searches now are for social networking sites.  This is doubly interesting since pornographers use some really aggressive and shady techniques to gain visibility on search engines.  And despite it all, their numbers are falling. Of course, 10 percent of today’s searches is significantly larger in sheer numbers than 20 percent of  searched 10 years ago would have been.  Still, going from 20 percent to 10 percent is a significant loss.

But Wait, There’s More

Whether companies are aware of it or not,  their employees are out there networking all over the place, on blogs, LinkedIn, FaceBook, MySpace, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube. New outlets are popping up like mushrooms after a big rain.  Some of them, like Yammer, are providing enterprise-specific social networking spaces.

Some companies - I’m fortunate enough to be employed by one of them - are embracing the notion of social media and looking for ways to enable employees to network, form communities, and work more seamlessly with their teams.  Very cool stuff.

What To Do Next

Companies can’t stop social media from intruding into their world, so it’s really time for executives to start getting their heads around how it will change their business and how it fits into their strategy.  Don’t wait for your agency to figure it out for you.  There are people in your own organization that are all over this- find them, engage them. listen to them.

What networks are you engaged in?  Is your company adopting social networking? Your experiences and observations welcome.

Related post: We’re Looking for the Mouse

Watch Clay Shirky’s presentation at Web 2.0 Expo 2008 San Francisco

Posted in blogging, social networking | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | No Comments »

Six Steps to Elevating Web Analytics in Your Organization

Posted by dpascoe on September 3, 2008

stairway to heaven

A website exists to further the organizational objectives of its owners.  Those objectives are directly related to the nature and purpose of the organization. For example, the challenges for pure online companes like Amazon.com, Overstock.com, eBay and others are quite different from bricks-and-mortar businesses with online presence, which in turn is completely different from government agencies, universities or non-profit organizations.

Large organizations, particularly those with online/offline operations, have many competing interests and stakeholders. It is imperative for the organization to know whether their website is pointed in the right direction, whether it is structurally sound and able to deliver on its objectives, and whether landing and conversion event pages are being optimized over time.  To the extent a site does this, it is in turn contributing to the organization’s larger goals and objectives - their true KPIs - increase leads, increase revenue, decrease cost per customer, improve self-serve rates, decrease complaint rates, increase inventory turn rate, etc.

Visitor measurement enables organizations to determine the effectiveness of their online presence.  Online web analytics has received, and continues to receive, significant attention. A whole new discipline and career choice has emerged. Articles and blogs are written about it.  It has its own industry association. Events have evolved that are devoted to it. All these things have cemented the term “web analytics” firmly in the online dictionary, and linked it at the hip with “visitor traffic”.

The downside is that online metrics have taken on a life of their own, as if the website is separate from the organization.  The development of web-specific KPIs for example, puts the focus on short-term goals, not organization goals.  While measuring web analyics data points that contribute to the organization’s overall success metrics is valid, those measurements are only a piece of the puzzle.

Management is bombarded everyday by people who claim to have the one thing to cure all ills.  Managers may not understand the web environment well enough to ask for analysis that goes deeper than conversion rate or page views or any of the other basic measurements, and frankly, they shouldn’t be expected to.   What they want is the “big picture” information, and what they need are people that understand these dynamics and that can be proactive in putting the web analytics information into the broader perspective.

In the recent “Where in the Organization is the Web Analyst” Survey, when asked “How do you feel about your web analytics activities”, 41% responded that they are frustrated because the organization does not act on the information, and 30% indicated they are overwhelmed with the amount of information they have to deal with.  I believe this is a symptom of the internal disconnect between online and offline objectives.

And in the face of chaos lies great opportunity :-)

With that framework, here are six things I believe savvy web analysts can to to raise their profile within their organizations.

  1. Understand the total business. Are you in an organization where inventory is important?   Are you in an organization where supplying information or support after the sale is vital? Are you in an industry where the website drives leads for sales that occur offline?  Are you a non-profit whose goal is to educate people and secure donations?  Are you in a government agency, providing information and services to citizens? Are you in the news business, where despite falling subscription rates, lots of people still get their news from the daily paper?  Even if you are in a business that “grew up” on the web, offline activities such as fulfillment, customer service and returns come into play.
  2. Understand how your organization measures itself against its strategic goals. If you don’t know what the overall organization goals are, ask. If you don’t get an answer, keep asking.
  3. Identify the “goal gaps”. Think about how the website contributes to - or gets in the way of - those goals, and identify how the information you see every day sheds light on where the two are aligned and where they are in conflict with each other.
  4. Apply the 80/20 rule. With enormous volumes of data, it can be difficult to know what to focus on - another issue pointed out in the Survey results.  As you gain more clarity around the organization’s goals, and how the strategy for the website supports them, focus on the 20% of the visitor data that supports overall organization goals, and disregard the rest.
  5. Frame your conversations with management in the broader context. Even if you don’t get it exactly right, at a minimum, you’ll make your boss aware that you are interested in the success of the business as a whole and you’ll create an opportunity to expand the conversation.
  6. Widen your circle. Seek out and network with the people in your organization that are responsible for web standards, search optimization, search marketing, overall site quality, responding to customer comments about the site, responding to customer inquiries that come in through the site.  Encourage them to share their insights with you and share yours with them.

Web analysts that can get outside the box, look at the nature of the organization they are part of, think about why it is there and what its goals are, how the website fits into the picture and what other moving parts impact decisions, and present their data in that context will elevate web analytics - and themselves - in the organization. Those that focus on short term goals based on web-specific KPIs risk being sidelined.

Do you agree? Disgree? Let me know your thoughts.

Posted in accessibility, privacy, quality, search engine optimization, usability, web analytics, web design, web standards | Tagged: , , , , , | No Comments »

Target Settles Accessibility Lawsuit with National Federation of the Blind (NFB)

Posted by dpascoe on August 29, 2008

August 27, 2008 - Target settled the suit brought against it in 2006 in California by the National Federation of the Blind.

Jared Smith’s article on the WebAIM site provides a summary of the settlement, commentary, and opinions of some WebAIM readers.

From the Joint Press Release

Dr. Marc Maurer, President of the National Federation of the Blind, said: “Access to Web sites is critical to the full and equal participation of blind people in all aspects of modern life. The National Federation of the Blind is pleased to have reached a settlement with Target that is good for all blind consumers, and we recognize that Target has already taken action to make certain that its Web site is accessible to everyone. We look forward to working with Target in the coming months to help make additional improvements that will enhance the experience of blind visitors to Target.com. It is our sincere hope that other businesses providing goods and services over the Internet will follow Target’s example and take affirmative steps to provide full access to their Web sites by blind consumers.”


From the AP story on MSNBC:

“We feel that it is a wake-up call to companies that have Web sites that are selling goods and services,” said Christopher S. Danielsen, a spokesman at the NFB. “They need to pay attention to accessibility. It is the right thing to do.” He also pointed out that the benefits of attracting new users far outweigh the costs of making changes to the site…Danielsen said that currently there are many retail sites that are “at least somewhat accessible” to the blind, but there’s more work to be done.

Back to WebAIM, their site contains excellent, detailed information about accessibility issues surrounding PDF and Flash, how they can be made accessible, as well as challenges and shortcomings.

I also recently ran across information about a browser specifically designed for visually impaired persons, called WebAnywhere.

Webguild tried it out and provided some observations.

The challenge of organizations to make their sites accessible is not going away. In looking at the comments above, I believe that the NFB, which has right on their side, is pretty comfortable being proactive on this front. Most, if not all, of the states have already passed or are considering legislation. Even though this settlement did nothing to clarify ADA Section 508 requirements where corporates are concerned, individual states have not stood still. Because of that, the NFB has plenty of other venues to press their case, if (when) they identify other opportunities to raise awareness.

Your comments/thoughts/observations welcome…..

Posted in accessibility, usability, web design | Tagged: , , , , | No Comments »

What’s Missing from Search Engine Marketing

Posted by dpascoe on August 27, 2008

First Michael Wexler holds up the mirror and asks “What Web Analytics is Missing”. Now Gerry Bavaro ponders the same thing about search engine marketing. Is there something in the water?

Gerry’s article is behind a password over at MediaPost, so I’ll summarize a few key points:
He starts out sharing feedback from people who attended the recent SES in San Jose.

“…it was really tactical…the widespread feelings primarily from agency folks about the state of our industry’s most popular trade shows reveal that they’re missing something….we’re not an industry that places the consumer at the center. Even worse, our channel (which gleans the most comprehensive, valuable intent data possible), is still a siloed, ancillary function in many organizations. “

OK, stop. I remember somebody else talking about disciplines fragmented (siloed) in organizations and how ineffective and ineffecient it is….oh, yeah, that was me, in February, 2007:


When Focus on ROI is Flawed

And again in February 2008 - Top Four Characteristics of the Optimal Web Team
And again in June 2008 - Web Optimization Defined
And again in July of 2008 - Continuing the Conversation with Joseph Carrabis
And again in the Response to Michael Wexler’s Post re:What Web Analytics is Missing

The words “broken record” come to mind.

So I wonder if they’ve been reading my blog, or have just finally come to the teachable moment on their own :-)

His next point:

“Where Are The Experts When “Everybody” Is An Expert? …we’ve created a virtually indistinguishable society of search marketers without a highly respected short list of true expert agencies….how to find the true experts…”

An excellent observation, and a question worth pondering. While I don’t eat, sleep and breathe SEM, and SEM and SEO are third cousins, not identical twins, analyzing a site for its “indexability” by search engines is one of the aspects of holistic site structural quality and an important part of SEM. You can’t run an SEM campaign extolling the virtues of nice cab savs and merlots and then attract people to a site selling soy milk. I would love to know how to find the true experts. We could have some interesting conversations.

“Do We Even Care What Clients Actually Think? …I’d love to know whether, as the WPP’s, IPG’s and Publicis’ of the world continue banking on digital and staffing up their search postures, their clients are happy or disappointed.”

What a clear-eyed and relevant question to ask. Congrats, Gerry for being brave enough to voice it.

“Where’s Strategic Vision & Best Practices Beyond Our Sandbox? ….Are discussions about the challenges and rewards of breaking down silos in global businesses and transforming operational processes to effectively manage change, what’s missing?”

Bravo - give that man a prize. None of these disciplines - not web analytics, not search engine marketing, not search engine optimization, not VOC, not A/B testing - none of them can stand alone. And the answer to his question is YES. We (I and my colleagues at Accenture Marketing Sciences) are out in the market every day talking to organizations about this very thing, and people are responding positively.

I do disagree with one concept:

“…the sleeping giants in the SEM industry are technologies that will go far beyond bid management, Web analytics, and post-click landing page optimization systems.”

The technologies are merely the means to an end. Without breaking down the silos, recognizing that Web sites must be treated as an asset, at the same level as land, labor and capital, with deliberate attention to the business strategy and how the Web properties contribute postively to it, and then implementing the governance structures, processes and infrastructure to support that vision, the technologies are nothing more than a shiny toy.

Do you agree or disagree? Isn’t it time to come together and realize that it’s not either/or…it’s and, and, and, and, and…..

Posted in accessibility, high performance site analytics, privacy, quality, search engine optimization, usability, web analytics, web design, web standards | Tagged: , , | No Comments »

Response to Michael Wexler’s Post re:What Web Analytics is Missing

Posted by dpascoe on August 15, 2008

Michael Wexler has just posted an article on his blog - What Web Analytics is Missing - that should be required reading for any one and everyone who is involved with site management and web analytics.  Finally somebody has the courage to come out and say that web analytics has warts and lots of them.  As I was reading it, I found myself thinking “this is the Bill Cosby of web analytics”.

And I agree with most everything Michael said, except on one point - “Understand My Site”.  For years, certain people in the web analytics community - I’m not naming names, you know who you are - have turned a blind eye to the “understand your site” concept.  It was as if they really believed that if you study your traffic data long enough and hard enough, all will be revealed, and that the underlying site structural elements were irrelevant in the big scheme of things.

Michael is spot on with the notion that understanding the site is an essential part of a broader picture.  The mere fact that understanding the site is in his post is a tacit recognition of how important it is, if people want to have any hope of making sense of their web analytics data.

However, it is not a path the web analytics companies should go down, unless they want to commit vendor suicide.

Site structures are increasingly complex, growing larger and more dynamic every day.  Understanding site structures is a much more complex undertaking than implementing web analytics. WA vendors that think they can knock up some site structure code and add it to their tool set in a couple of months will be sadly mistaken.  While they become increasing distracted from their core business and invest increasingly more development resources and dollars trying to solve ever more complex site structure issues, their competitors will be picking off their customers one by one.

I agree that WA vendors should focus on addressing all the warts inherent in their core business -  if Michael’s assessment is correct, that should keep them busy for quite a while.  They should leave site structural analysis to the people that have it as their core. And they should seek out those people and find ways to partner so that the companies buying their services reap the benefits.  The smart money is on the vendors that have already figured that out.

Only somebody from inside the web analytics community could hold up a mirror the way Michael has - let’s hope people are listening.

Posted in web analytics | Tagged: | 1 Comment »

The Best Use of Flash I’ve Seen

Posted by dpascoe on July 24, 2008

My colleague Kurt has been working on some flash-related stuff that he just shared with me. As part of his work, he researched the history of Flash. I’ve included some Flash history trivia below.

First, though, the thing he brought to my attention that I’m so excited about is one of the best uses of flash I have ever seen. It is a jointly sponsored game-as-advertisement between Disney and Wal-Mart - sporting Wal-Mart’s new logo - for Hannah Montana gear.

Hannah Montana shopping list

Hannah Montana shopping list

What’s so cool about it?
There are many - too many too count - examples of self-indulgent-over-the-top-with-no-real-purpose Flash. This is not one of those.

First you get to define your avatar’s hair and eye color. Next you can design your Hannah Montana bedroom, and dress your avatar in Hannah Montana gear. Ok so far, nothing terribly earth-shattering.

Now, look in the bottom right corner - you can print out a list of all the items you chose, complete with prices, all available for purchase from your local Wal-Mart. This is not just Flash for Flash’s sake. It is well thought out, with benefits for everyone. It’s engaging, it’s fun, it has a purpose. Since this is co-sponsored, both companies will benefit from the traffic metrics that result. Disney will gain insight about visitor engagement for this character and line of merchandise. Wal-Mart can identify which items they need to stock more of based on what items were chosen. You, the consumer, know before you go what you’re looking for and how much it’s going to cost. Sure it’s an ad, but it’s an ad that actually gives something of value - brilliant stuff!

Rant Starts Here
I have a violent allergy to most online ads - why? Because it feels, to me the consumer, like a constant barrage, and endless intrusion and attempt at manipulation, not a sincere attempt at providing something I want or need. When an advertiser can see things from my point of view, that speaks volumes. Why is this important, in the big scheme of things? Because now we have social networks like Myspace and Facebook whose members, like me, are way allergic to ads. If you’re not following this topic, trust me when I tell you that there are two current holy grails of advertising - one is advertising to the vast population of mobile phone users, and the other is advertising to the vast social network. These two frontiers are giving advertisers fits. This advertiser-consumer synergy has been achieved with the Disney-Wal-Mart-Hannah Montana game-as-advertisement. Congrats to Disney and Wal-Mart for thinking past the obvious, and including the consumer in the mix.

Rant over. :-)

Another Example of “Good” Flash
My other favorite Flash application is My M&Ms - Pick your colors, customize the message, pick the packaging, complete the order - yum!

Flash History Trivia
1995 - Started out as SmartSketch, developed by a company named FutureWave
FutureWave unsuccessfully pitches itself to Adobe
May, 1996 - SmartSketch, now renamed FutureSplash Animator, ships
August, 1996 - Microsoft adopts the technology
Disney becomes a client
December, 1996 -Macromedia acquires FutureWave, renames software to Macromedia Flash 1.0.
April, 2005 - Adobe acquires Macromedia for $3.4B in stock

Interesting how things work out…….

You can read Jonathan Gay’s full history of Flash here.

Permalink for this post: http://weblog.maxamine.com/2008/07/24/the-best-use-of-flash-ive-seen/

Posted in ads and ad spending, usability, web analytics, web design | Tagged: , , , | No Comments »

Continuing the Discussion with Joseph Carrabis

Posted by dpascoe on July 19, 2008

I’ve been participating in a very interesting discussion with Joseph on The Future of Web Analytics Demystified.

My comments to his most recent comments are posted there and here.

Joseph’s comments:
“…my experience and learning indicate that most business people don’t care about science.”

Agreed, however they don’t have to care about it to use it. Anyone who has ever used a tire gauge or a tape measure has employed a scientific calibration method.

Take web analytics; vendor produces web analytics tool – company buys web analytics tool - company is responsible for correct, complete and functioning implementation of web analytics tool - automated monitoring identifies implementation problems. This last step is the rub. The web analytics vendor specializes in providing the measurement tool, not the calibration tool. The company does not have to be expert at science to employ automated monitoring of their web analytics. It must, however have accountability at a senior level – one neck to grab - and a recognition that without this calibration, all bets are off, and that manual discovery of implementation problems is a complete and utter waste of valuable time that their web analysts could be using to do more important things. The results of my survey that is currently underway (Where in the Organization is the Web Analyst – July 15-22, 2008) will bear out the chronic problems that practitioners have with their own implementations.

Going back to Avinash’s observation – “We have too many damn tools!’” Yep, the toolbox has 4 hammers, 5 screwdrivers and a utility knife, and the task calls for cutting a mitered corner. Now I suppose you could position the utility knife, whack it with the hammer, wedge a screwdriver in the crevice, and repeat the process until you make your way across the board…..it’s possible, not efficient, the outcome will be really ugly, but it’s possible.

Joseph’s question : “Is the natural progression due to the tools being used, due to the information provider becoming more trusted, perhaps due to the people receiving the information finally having the cognitive readiness to accept the information as both valuable and valid, …?”

I believe it is a confluence of things contributing to maturation in organizations. The web has disrupted entire industries – newspapers, auto, real estate, travel, consumer goods, government agencies. It would be great if somebody had an “Easy Button” for managing web assets – maybe Staples could start loaning them out. People are coming to grips with the fact that no one product is the magic answer, and that jumping from one vendor to another is not the answer either. They are coming to grips with the complexity of their sites, the fact that legislation and market conditions are constantly changing, that they are subject to the laws of all the countries they operate sites in, that achieving good natural placement in Google has a tangible benefit, and that bad things can happen to good sites, and can lurk there for a long time, that if you’re a great big company, you might be a “target” for lawsuits by people who find your site inaccessible to them, that the mobile web tsunami is coming, all this in addition to the daily grind of figuring out who is looking at what for how long using what type of viewing device and what are they doing as a result? Joseph refers to it as “cognitive readiness”. I’ve always called it “the teachable moment.” Increasingly organizations are getting there.

Joseph’s comment:
“I’d love to see a piece that demonstrates the successful implementation of such a group if such is available.”

Here are a couple of success stories. The first one is a site of around 2000 pages owned by a company with numerous locations across the country. The site’s primary function is lead generation and information provision on health-related issues. SEO is important to them and they run online ad campaigns. They conduct surveys through the site. The organization supporting the site is small, so they rely on their vendors. Once a month, the manager has a call where all the vendors are present – site structure, web analyst, SEM, search analyst, survey company. Everyone is expected to present information and recommendations based on the agenda the manager sets.

The second is a global B2B company. Their public site is large, their intranet is sprawling, and they have a constant flow of micro-sites going up. Their web team consists of people with expertise in search, web analytics, copyrighting, marketing, ad campaigns; yet they all are part of one team. Content management is dispersed throughout the organization using a CMS that was developed in-house after they determined that there was not a market solution that fit their business. This team, however, has dotted lines to content owners and teams. Decisions of what web site management solutions they use (whether it is traffic, search, A/B testing, surveys, or structural analytics) are made by this team. They have developed and are utilizing web standards and continue to grow from strength to strength.

There are others. I like these two because they are at opposite ends of the spectrum and demonstrate that there is more than one way to get there, once people define what it is they are trying to achieve.

Your comments are most welcome. What are you seeing in your organization?

Posted in mobile web, quality, search engine optimization, web analytics, web design, web standards | Tagged: , , , | 3 Comments »

It’s back! “Where in the Organization is the Web Analyst?” Survey

Posted by dpascoe on July 15, 2008

Many of you participated in the survey in December.  Your participation was most appreciated and provoked more questions and a spin-off survey, “What in the World Does the Web Analyst Do?”.  See the Survey Results page for those results.

If you just took it, and arrived here from there, thank you for participating.  I’m already seeing results.

This time the questions have been combined and a couple of new questions have been added, along with a few other refinements….

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=ZMHnEO9H1kveqXYSYkcgig_3d_3d

The survey will be open for 7 days and is anonymous.  Just like last time, it will only take a tiny bit of your day - 2-3 minutes. Just like last time, a summary of the results and a link to the full report will be posted here on the forum.  If you take the survey and think of some glaring omission - a burning question you wish had been included, please tell me! Post your comments here.

Thanks in advance for your input and for being part of the “finger on the pulse”.

Posted in web analytics | Tagged: , , , , | No Comments »

Web Optimization Defined

Posted by dpascoe on June 18, 2008

I have noticed that variations on the term “web optimization” are increasingly bringing traffic to the blog - “what is web optimization’, “how to do web optimization”, for example.  In checking my stats, these variations were by far the top terms in the past 90 days.  This just tells me it’s time to describe this in fuller detail.

Web optimization is much bigger than increasing your Google page rank, increasing your page views, having a sexier design, identifying web analytics KPIs or any of the other facets of the prism you can name.   While each of those activities is important, and we are happy that there are people who focus on them intently enough to become subject matter experts, none of them can stand alone.  None has the magic pixie dust that will, if sprinkled correctly, yield the optimal web experience for users and beaucoup dollars for the site owners.

The evolution of these different disciplines, while important and necessary, has had some unfortunate side effects.  The surveys I conducted in Dec/January reflect an example of these side effects.  Web analytics practitioners are often isolated in their organizations. They have significant challenges in getting people to listen and take action.  The person they report to is frequently not at a high enough level to effect changes across the site.

Web optimization is the “big tent” that not only welcomes, but actually needs all disciplines.  To optimize, site owners must utilize complementary solutions that enable them to bring together data from different sources so they can make informed decisions.

We are out in the market every day, talking to companies about their web properties.  What we know is that companies are tired of being confused, and are looking for a way forward. And that way combines these elements:

  1. Strategic alignment - ensure that the site strategy is aligned with business goals
  2. Structural integrity - ensure the site is structurally sound and is delivering a good visitor experience and that the key areas are being continually optimized.
  3. Governance - implementation of solutions, methods and practices that facilitate continuous improvement and monitoring of digital assets all across the organization, for quality and compliance metrics, search optimization, web analytics measurements, survey results, advertising campaign effectiveness.

You can not optimize in a sub-optimal environment.   The fragmentation has to stop.  It is costly and inefficient.  Companies are spending huge amounts of money, hiring agencies, buying solutions, and training employees to create, manage, market and monitor web sites, and this fragmentation muddies the waters and keeps companies from truly understanding whether their activities yield - or are even capable of  yielding - the results they want for themselves and their visitors.

This message is resonating loud and clear with the people we talk to.  It clears away the “magic pixie dust” cacaphony that surrounds and bombards their senses every day.   It’s water in the desert, light in the dark, it’s……well, i’ve run out of pithy metaphors, but you get the picture :-)

Do you agree or disagree?  What are your observations?

Posted in high performance site analytics, metrics and measurement, quality, search, search engine optimization, usability, web analytics, web design, web standards | Tagged: , , , , , , | 2 Comments »